Japanese Knotweed Myths and Misconceptions

Do you want to get rid of Japanese knotweed? Do you have an insight into the threats posed by this plant? Have you information about different things and false notions the people have about it? Well! Japanese knotweed is undoubtedly dangerous for your building, and other plants, and you should remove it. But here are many ideas about its eradication and about the best strategy to get rid of this harmful and poisonous herb. You think about pouring salt or diesel on the plant to get rid of it. You also learn about killing the plant with caustic soda, turpentine, ad fairy liquid by pouring it into the ground. These common fallacies have got a boost in recent years. Some people take innovative measures to kill this plant, and some will tell you about really ridiculous methods to eliminate it from your neighboring backyard.

Removal services

There are different Japanese knotweed removal services or eradication of the plant in almost every big city. There is a lot of informative literature on the internet about ways and techniques to remove it. There are lot f local contractors offering this service. There are ethical, professionals, and trained people to guide you about the plant. You may contact such professionals for the purpose. In this way, you may find different means and methods to know what exactly Japanese knotweed is and what this plant can do or may not do. There are a lot of assertions about the plants, and you may have noted some.

Some assertions about the plant

  • It grows fast through cemented and concrete structures.
  • The Japanese knotweed may weaken the foundations
  • Structure damage is the characteristic of Japanese knotweed.
  • If they grow without any obstructions, the plant may damage your building.
  • There are opposite dramatic effects posed by this plant on structures and concrete areas.

Japanese knotweed can’t grow through a slab of sturdy concrete. You may see by yourself that the plant cannot grow on concrete structures if it is completed correctly, so the notion is wrong. Similarly, there are a lot of such things about the plant. The adverse effects of the plant on any concrete structure is a few and far between occurrence.

What the false things about it may be, it is a fact that we should remove it.


Report highlights the value of Greater Manchester’s trees

Data was collected from 6,000+ trees all across the area of Greater Manchester utilising tools such as a bs5837 tree survey.  The ones gathering this data were a group of 57 surveyors who had visited approximately 2,000 plots of land. This action was taken to help compute the economic as well as environmental benefits which trees provide. Along with the benefits, the team of 57 were also looking for any signs of risks to the tree health.

The results of this data gathering showed that there are roughly 11,321,386 trees with 15.7% of them being beneath Great Manchester’s tree canopy.

This data also displays that approximately one million trees are in danger of being lost to diseases and pests such as the Horse Chestnut Bleeding Canker and Ash Die back.

Furthermore, Greater Manchester’s trees act as a sort of filtration system, removing about 847 tonnes of tonnes of pollutants per annum. These trees also help absorb excessive storm water so far, intercepting about 1,644,415 cubic meters of the same, each year.

Along with this, they also confiscate about 56,530 tonnes of carbon every year. The current carbon for all the trees in this region equals 1,573,015 tonnes.

The entire economic value of storm water retention, air pollution filtration and carbon sequestration within Greater Manchester’s trees amounts to £33,298,891 per year.

This survey had been carried out all over Greater Manchester this autumn and summer collecting data such as width, diameter, tree species and height.

The most commonly occurring species of trees in the Greater Manchester region are Sycamore, Hawthorn and the English Oak.

This data, once collected is entered into the i-tree software algorithms, from where the information is processed, and it displays vital results such as the economic value of the trees, threats which may affect the trees and where there is potential for the land to nurture more trees.

These same results will also be informed to the Greater Manchester and Woodland Strategy, which will then be published in the Spring of next year. Additionally, another report will also create recommendations for maintaining woodlands to further improve the biodiversity and create homes for the wildlife, especially for the endangered ones.

One individual at the City of Trees, Bryan Cosgrove said that the i-tree numbers display the vital role which the trees and woods play in fighting climate change and ensuring the city’s regions are more secured for the future. By valuing the Greater Manchester’s trees and woods it can be ensured that they have not been priced just in terms of how they enhance the area’s looks, but also as natural assets which provide a wealth of vital economic and environmental advantages.

He also stated that the figures showing the number of trees that at risk from disease and pests are a cause of great concern and shows the need for immediate action by planting even more trees as well as ensuring the ones the ones that are already present remain safe for as long as possible. The City of Trees completed its largest i-tree survey outside the US across Greater Manchester.